The Influence of Retention Politics on Judges' Voting
This study shows that the political preferences of those responsible for retaining judges are strongly associated with judicial voting. The evidence supports the widespread belief that judges respond to political pressure in an effort to be reelected or reappointed. Using a data set of decisions in state supreme courts from 1995-98, I find that state supreme court judges who face retention decisions by Republicans tend to decide cases in accord with standard Republican policy. Judicial behavior is correspondingly liberal for judges facing retention decisions by Democrats. The results are strongest for judges facing partisan reelections. Among judges with conservative fundamental ideologies, those facing Democratic retention agents vote more liberally than those facing Republican retention agents. Similarly, judges' voting changes when the political preferences of the retention agents change. Judges with permanent tenure and judges in their last term do not respond to the same forms of political pressure. (c) 2009 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved..
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Shepherd, Joanna M. |
Published in: |
The Journal of Legal Studies. - University of Chicago Press. - Vol. 38.2009, 1, p. 169-206
|
Publisher: |
University of Chicago Press |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Does capital punishment have a deterrent effect? : new evidence from postmoratorium panel data
Dezhbakhsh, Hashem, (2008)
-
The deterrent effect of capital punishment : evidence from a "judicial experiment"
Dezhbakhsh, Hashem, (2006)
-
The politics of judicial opposition
Shepherd, Joanna M., (2010)
- More ...