The inside scoop: Acceptance and rejection at the journal of international economics
There is little work on the inner workings of journals. What factors seem to affect the ability to publish in a journal? Could simple rules (which are already used by some journals) like the desk rejection of a significant minority of papers, help to streamline the process? At what cost? How well do journals seem to do in choosing papers? What can we say about the extent of type 1 and type 2 errors? Do editors seem to have uniform standards or are some harsher than others? We use data on submissions to the Journal of International Economics to help answer these questions.
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Cherkashin, Ivan ; Demidova, Svetlana ; Imai, Susumu ; Krishna, Kala |
Published in: |
Journal of International Economics. - Elsevier, ISSN 0022-1996. - Vol. 77.2009, 1, p. 120-132
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Keywords: | Publishing in Economics Performance evaluation Probit model Selection bias |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The inside scoop : acceptance and rejection at the journal of international economics
Čerkašin, I., (2009)
-
The inside scoop : acceptance and rejection at the Journal of International Economics
Cherkashin, Ivan, (2008)
-
The Inside Scoop : Acceptance and Rejection at the Journal of International Economics
Cherkashin, Ivan, (2008)
- More ...