The market for corporate control and the cost of debt
How do bondholders view the existence of an open market for corporate control? Between 1985 and 1991, 30 states in the U.S. enacted business combination (BC) laws, raising the cost of corporate takeovers. Relying on these exogenous events, we estimate the influence of the market for corporate control on the cost of debt. We identify different channels through which an open market for corporate control can benefit or harm bondholders: a reduction in managerial slack or the "quiet life," resulting in higher profitability and firm value; a coinsurance effect, in which firms become less risky after being acquired; and an increasing leverage effect, in which bondholder wealth is expropriated through leverage-increasing takeovers. Consistent with the first two mechanisms, we find that the cost of debt rose after the passage of the BC laws; moreover, it rose sharply for firms in non-competitive industries, and for firms rated speculative-grade. In contrast, there is virtually no effect for firms in competitive industries, or firms rated investment-grade.
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Qiu, Jiaping ; Yu, Fan |
Published in: |
Journal of Financial Economics. - Elsevier, ISSN 0304-405X. - Vol. 93.2009, 3, p. 505-524
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Keywords: | Cost of debt Credit spread Market for corporate control Business combination laws |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The market for corporate control and the cost of debt
Qiu, Jiaping, (2009)
-
Credit derivatives and analyst behavior
Batta, George Eli, (2016)
-
Endogenous Liquidity in Credit Derivatives
Qiu, Jiaping, (2011)
- More ...