The Paradox of the Bayesian Experts and State-Dependent Utility Theory.
When "n" individuals satisfy the axioms of subjective expected utility (SEU) theory and these individuals' probabilities or/and utilities are sufficiently diverse, it is impossible to aggregate the individuals' preferences into a (n+1)-preference which is both Paretian and in agreement with SEU theory. The paper restates this paradox in the framework of Anscombe and Aumann's axiomatization of SEU and investigates the consequences of relaxing their state-independence assumption.
Year of publication: |
1996
|
---|---|
Authors: | Mongin, P. |
Institutions: | Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), École des Sciences Économiques de Louvain |
Subject: | WELFARE ECONOMICS | UNCERTAINTY | RISK |
Saved in:
Series: | |
---|---|
Type of publication: | Book / Working Paper |
Notes: | 36 pages |
Classification: | D60 - Welfare Economics. General ; D70 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making. General ; D80 - Information and Uncertainty. General ; D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty |
Source: |
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005669231
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
On Risk - Building a Definition
Lemos, Filipe, (2016)
-
On welfare frameworks and catastrophic climate risks
Millner, Antony, (2013)
-
Legal Uncertainty as a Welfare Enhancing Screen
Lang, Matthias, (2016)
- More ...
Similar items by person