The privacy role of information intermediaries through self-regulation
Through qualitative analysis of the policies of two major global information intermediaries — Google and Microsoft — and related case studies, this paper demonstrates a) that intermediaries' participation in self-regulatory programmes and implementation of privacy principles does not necessarily translate into meaningful privacy safeguards for users in the face of growing private surveillance capacity; and b) that within the EU and US self-regulatory frameworks, information intermediaries have discretionary power to set their policies and practices prioritising strategic interests over privacy commitments. Discussions in this paper complement existing studies on the implementation of privacy principles stipulated in Fair Information Practices (FIPs) by enhancing understanding about the role of information intermediaries in defining privacy conditions of users within self-regulation.
Year of publication: |
2016
|
---|---|
Authors: | Sargsyan, Tatevik |
Published in: |
Internet Policy Review. - Berlin : Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society, ISSN 2197-6775. - Vol. 5.2016, 4, p. 1-17
|
Publisher: |
Berlin : Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society |
Subject: | Privacy | Intermediaries | Platforms | Self-regulation | Fair Information Practices | Terms of Service (TOS) |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
Understanding privacy online : development of a social contract approach to privacy
Martin, Kirsten, (2016)
-
Back up: Can users sue platforms to reinstate deleted content?
Kettemann, Matthias C., (2020)
-
Why (don’t) firms free ride on an intermediary’s advice?
Shen, Bo, (2019)
- More ...