The Quality of Aid Statistics What We Should Be Measuring, and Why We Don’t
Measuring the size of international development aid is no easy matter. All sorts of definitional and statistical issues arise, and there are inevitably grey areas surrounding a concept that is so politically and normatively charged. This paper proposes a coherent framework for alternative aid measures. Against this background the statistics on aid published annually by the OECD are being assessed. The analysis focuses on three categories of aid: technical assistance, soft loans and debt relief. It is argued that lack of rigour and consistency considerably weaken the relevance of aid statistics for policy makers and researchers.
Year of publication: |
2003
|
---|---|
Authors: | Renard, R. ; Cassimon, D. |
Published in: |
Review of Business and Economics. - Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfswetenschappen. - Vol. XLVIII.2003, 4, p. 652-674
|
Publisher: |
Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfswetenschappen |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
An assessment of debt-for-education swaps
Cassimon, Danny, (2009)
-
The quality of aid statistics : what we should be measuring, and why we don't
Renard, Robrecht A., (2003)
-
On the pitfalls of measuring aid
Renard, Robrecht A., (2001)
- More ...