The responsibility principle and the democratic firm
The recent Enron-type scandals have reinvigorated the corporate governance debate. The purpose of this paper is to situate that debate in a much older and more fundamental debate about the organization of production. This paper presents a modern reconstruction of a property rights argument for the democratic firm (a firm whose legal members are the people working in it). The old “fruits of their labor” argument is reformulated using the ordinary responsibility principle that legal responsibility is to be imputed to whoever is in fact responsible. Far from conflicting with private property, the responsibility principle provides grounds for the just appropriation of private property. However, there is a conflict with the legal contract for the renting of human beings, the employment contract, in view of thede facto nontransferability of responsibility. This recognition of the invalidity of the employment contract can be independently arrived at using a modern reconstruction of an inalienable rights argument from the Reformation and Enlightenment. Finally these arguments are applied to the corporate governance debate to suggest a rechartering of corporations so that shareholders become debt-holders and the people working in a corporation become its legal members.
Year of publication: |
2003
|
---|---|
Authors: | Ellerman, David |
Published in: |
Forum for Social Economics. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 0736-0932. - Vol. 33.2003, 1, p. 13-22
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
On some alleged “problems” and alleged “solutions” in democratic firms
Ellerman, David, (2020)
-
The Market Mechanism of Appropriation
Ellerman, David, (2004)
-
Property and contract in economics : the case for economic democracy
Ellerman, David P., (1992)
- More ...