The Role of Default in Macroeconomics
What is the main limitation of much modern macro-economic theory, among the failings pointed out by William R. White at the 2010 Mayekawa Lecture? We argue that the main deficiency is a failure to incorporate the possibility of default, including that of banks, into the core of the analysis. With default assumed away, there can be no role for financial intermediaries, for financial disturbances, or even for money. Models incorporating defaults are, however, harder to construct, in part because the representative agent fiction must be abandoned. Moreover, financial crises are hard to predict and to resolve. All of the previously available alternatives for handling failing systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs) are problematical. We end by discussing a variety of current proposals for improving the resolution of failed SIFIs.
Year of publication: |
2011
|
---|---|
Authors: | Goodhart, Charles ; Tsomocos, Dimitrios |
Publisher: |
IMES Discussion Paper |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The Optimal Monetary Instrument for Prudential Purposes
Goodhart, Charles, (2011)
-
On Dividend Restrictions and the Collapse of the Interbank Market
Goodhart, Charles, (2010)
-
State Prices, Liquidity, and Default
Espinoza, Raphaƫl, (2009)
- More ...