The state in the social sphere: departing or staying? Social reforms in central eastern Europe and Russia
The article presents a comprehensive analysis of welfare states in Central Eastern Europe and Russia from their foundations in the Soviet period through post-communist transition, with focus on the years after 1990. The article covers the emergence, structure, performance and transformations of these welfare states, including social insurance, health care, labor market institutions, and the gender dimension. Mapping trajectories of post-communist welfare state change, the text considers scholarly debates about the agents of change, including external agents such as the European Union and International Financial Institutions, as well as domestic societal interests and state-institutional actors. The story involves communist legacies and strong elements of path dependency, as well as varying levels of fiscal constraint, policy innovation and path-departing changes. The author finds that post-communist restructuring and retrenchment have reshaped statist welfare systems in market-conforming directions throughout the post-communist region, redefining the boundaries between public and private responsibility for societal well-being. Social insurance has been partially privatized in most states, labor market institutions have been made more flexible, and family benefits have been broadly retrenched. At the same time, post-communist welfare states have shown divergent patterns of change. CEE welfare states have been shaped by the layering of solidaristic communist legacies, conservative Bismarckian social insurance revivals, and the liberal imprint of international institutions. They have liberalized, but retain large elements of public responsibility for welfare and affinities to Europe. In Russia, sharper economic contraction led to deeper retrenchment, liberalization and informalization of the social sector; then, after 2005 Russia more generous statist and paternalist elfare policies. Post-communist welfare states are distinctive; they do not fit any existing Western typologies or models.
Year of publication: |
2014
|
---|---|
Authors: | Kuk, Linda |
Published in: |
Public administration issues. - Higher School of Economics. - 2014, 2, p. 120-144
|
Publisher: |
Higher School of Economics |
Subject: | paternalism | social policy | the countries of Central and Eastern Europe | ransformation | social insurance | labor market institutions | gender dimension | the étatist model of social policy | a welfare state | the role of the state | post-communist countries | liberalization | traditionalism |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
Unemployment and subsequent employment stability : does labour market policy matter?
Wulfgramm, Melike, (2015)
-
Fossati, Flavia, (2018)
-
Fuchs, Benjamin, (2023)
- More ...