The Trouble with Cases
Frederick Schauer, Richard Zeckhauser
For several decades now a debate has raged about policy-making by litigation. Spurred by the way in which tobacco, environmental, and other litigation has functioned as an alternative form of regulation, the debate asks whether policy-making or regulation by litigation is more or less socially desirable than more traditional policy-making by ex ante rule-making by legislatures or administrative agencies. In this paper we step into this debate, but not to come down on one side or another, all things considered
Year of publication: |
August 2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Schauer, Frederick |
Other Persons: | Zeckhauser, Richard (contributor) |
Institutions: | National Bureau of Economic Research (contributor) |
Publisher: |
Cambridge, Mass : National Bureau of Economic Research |
Subject: | Regulierung | Regulation | Politikwissenschaft | Political science | Politische Entscheidung | Political decision | Gesetzgebung | Legislation | Rechtsprechung | Court decisions |
Saved in:
freely available
Extent: | 1 Online-Ressource |
---|---|
Series: | NBER working paper series ; no. w15279 |
Type of publication: | Book / Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Notes: | System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files Mode of access: World Wide Web Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers. |
Other identifiers: | 10.3386/w15279 [DOI] |
Source: | ECONIS - Online Catalogue of the ZBW |
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012463372