The UTR versus CU Formation Analysis and Article XXIV
In 1965, Cooper and Massell (Economic Journal 75: 742-7) showed that a policy of unilateral tariff reduction (UTR) was superior to the formation of a customs union (CU). Although their model was concerned with only static resource reallocation effects, many analysts treated the Cooper/Massell 'criticism' as if it applied to the entire CU formation issue. This was incomprehensible, especially when they themselves almost simultaneously developed a different model to demonstrate that two countries together can do more than each acting alone. Wonnacott and Wonnacott (1981,American Economic Review 71: 704-14) tried to revive the issue by claiming that the use of a three-country general equilibrium model with transportation costs and tariffs by the rest of the world could show that UTR need not dominate CU formation, but El-Agraa and Jones (2000,Applied Economics Letters 7: 301-4; Journal of Economic Integration 15: 239-59) have demonstrated that their claim is unwarranted, due to inadequacies in their model. This paper shows that the incorporation of WTO/GATT rules (Article XXIV) into an appropriately adjusted orthodox framework leads to the Wonnacott's conclusion.
Year of publication: |
2002
|
---|---|
Authors: | El-Agraa, Ali |
Published in: |
Applied Economics Letters. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 1350-4851. - Vol. 9.2002, 9, p. 621-624
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
El-Agraa, Ali, (2000)
-
The EU/China relationship: not seeing eye to eye?
El-Agraa, Ali, (2007)
-
EU ‘economic and human rights’ examined within the context of regional integration worldwide
El-Agraa, Ali, (2008)
- More ...