The 'Why' and 'How' of Human Resource (HR) Practices : A Critical Review of the Antecedents and Consequences of Employee HR Attributions Research

When a firm implements certain HR practices, different employees attribute different motives and intentions to the firm with regards to those HR practices. Research on HR attributions has made progress toward understanding the relationship between HR practices and employee outcomes from a process perspective. However, this research is still fragmented and lacks a systematic typology of the different types of HR attributions and a compelling organizing research framework. Furthermore, a number of research gaps and opportunities have emerged regarding the nomological net of employee HR attributions. To address the gaps and capitalize on the opportunities, we propose an overarching theory-driven multi-level framework that guides the choice of the antecedents and outcomes of employee HR attributions and explains their relationships along with both mediating and moderating mechanisms. Drawing on signaling theory embedded in our proposed framework, we identify and categorize various antecedents of employee HR attributions to explain their relationships. We also use several additional theories such as social exchange and the job demands-resources model included in our review to identify and categorize various outcomes of employee HR attributions across levels of analysis (i.e., individual, collective [team/group/unit], organization) and explain their relationships. In addition, our proposed framework explains how individual-level employee HR attributions emerge at the collective level and influence collective processes and outcomes. We end our review by pinpointing future research needs and discussing related future research directions