Gender economic is a rapidly developing science, however not rapidly enough. The world still suffers from severe female discrimination. The problem of female discrimination is widely recognized on global scale and included in SDG (#5). International organizations strive to improve inequality by introducing gender indexes and conducting global analysis, particularly focusing on developing countries, as women are literally in danger there. However, global analysis fails to capture the depth and the complexity of gender inequality in different countries, up to identifying trends that actually contradict reality (for example, Sri Lanka case). In that sense national and regional gender analysis are required. I suggest alternative methodology to capture inequality in axis institutions that include family, education, knowledge production & governing, - the most influential and conservative institutions, highly resistant to external influence. Axial institutions form and maintain moral and ethical standards. Thorough cross-country examination of axis institutions opens new frontiers in gender studies, as it helps to identify the variety of factors; to weight variables of gender inequality; and to calculate their respectful impact on GDP growth rate and birthrate. Including birthrate and family institution helps to escape common mistake, when crude women empowerment policies cause double burden effect and decrease birthrates. Advanced Asian Economies - Japan, Republic of Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong and Taiwan, share both socio-economic model and Confucianism, which is widely blamed for gender inequality in Japan and in South Korea. However, Singapore and Hong Kong enter top-ten gender equal states, according to gender indexes (UN, WEF, OECD). The research aims to capture gender inequality in axial institutions of advanced Asia, and to trace the key factors of gender inequality and their impact on GDP growth rates and birthrates
