Thinking Like a Game Theorist: Comment
In a recent paper in Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Croson (2000) shows that when subjects' beliefs about the contributions of others are elicited in a voluntary contributions public goods game, those subjects contribute less than do other subjects in the same game when beliefs are not elicited. We report briefly on a similar experiment where we do not observe this. There are small differences between this experiment and Croson's that may explain these different results, but none of these explanations are completely satisfying. So while Croson shows that belief elicitation procedures may have unwanted effects, this does not always occur; and it may be difficult to predict when and where belief elicitation procedures will have such undesirable effects.
Year of publication: |
2000
|
---|---|
Authors: | Feltovich, Nick ; Wilcox, Nathaniel T. |
Institutions: | Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics, Monash Business School |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Feltovich, Nick, (2014)
-
How sensitive are bargaining outcomes to changes in disagreement payoffs?
Anbarci, Nejat, (2011)
-
Bargaining with random arbitration: an experimental study
Anbarci, Nejat, (2011)
- More ...