Transformation of the Constitutional System of the Slovak Republic (?)
Purpose of the article is to analyze the Constitutional Act No. 356/2011 Z. Coll. amending the Constitution of the Slovak Republic in terms of its compatibility of the constitutional system of the Slovak Republic. The article analyzes the potential impact of amendment to the Constitution of the Slovak Republic on the Parliamentary form of the government of the Slovak Republic and examine the consistency of Art. 115 Para 3 of the Constitution of the Slovak Republic with another provisions that relate to it. The purpose of the article is to identify some problems that brought amendment to the Constitution of the Slovak Republic by the Constitutional Act No. 356/2011 Coll. of Art. 115 Para 3 and points out its incompatibility with the constitutional text. This article also discusses a possible shift in the parliamentary constitutional system of the Slovak Republic which the Constitutional Act brought.Methodology/methods used in the article is the analysis of the Constitutional Act No. 356/2011Coll. by induction from the concrete wording of Art. 115 Para 3 of the Constitution of the Slovak Republic to the conclusions in relation to the entire text of the Constitution of the Slovak Republic and to the whole constitutional system of the Slovak Republic Scientific aim is to point to the shortcomings of the Constitutional Act No. 356/2011 Z. Coll., not only from the perspective of constitutional interpretation, but potentially also in terms of practice and also show the wrong trend of breaking the internal unity and coherence of the constitutional system of the Slovak Republic by half-baked changes to the text of the Constitution of the Slovak Republic Findings are specific and severe systemic disorders that brought the amendment to the Constitution of the Slovak Republic by the Constitutional Act No. 356/2011 Coll. of Art. 115 Para 3. The Article identifies three concrete problems and the subsequent practice may bring some other issues that were not known at the time of processing of this Article Conclusions are directed to the fact, that the Constitutional Act No. 356/2011 Coll. means internal disturbance of the constitutional system of the Slovak Republic, brings more problems than constructive solutions and potentially deflects the parliamentary constitutional system of the Slovak Republic to the semi-presidential.
Year of publication: |
2011
|
---|---|
Authors: | Boris, Balog |
Published in: |
Creative and Knowledge Society. - De Gruyter Open. - Vol. 1.2011, 2, p. 70-82
|
Publisher: |
De Gruyter Open |
Subject: | The Constitution of the Slovak Republic | The National Council of the Slovak Republic | The Government of the Slovak Republic | responsibility of the government | constitutional amendment |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
Goods and services tax : the introduction process
Raghuram, G., (2015)
-
Type 2 Political Corruption: Sources, Impacts, Solutions
Owen, Bruce, (2012)
-
Can the Bill Bring Desired Outcomes?
Ghatak, Maitreesh, (2012)
- More ...