Two Arguments for Basic Income: Thomas Paine (1737-1809) and Thomas Spence (1750-1814)
In the 1790s the radical thinkers Tom Paine and Thomas Spence were among the first to advocate the payment of a Basic Income as a right to all citizens. In this paper we outline Paine’s position, as set out in The Rights of Man (1791-1792) and in Agrarian Justice (1795), and compare it with the case made by Spence in The Rights of Infants (1797). We show that their arguments were surprisingly complex, and included utilitarian grounds for supporting Basic Income in addition to an assertion of the individual’s right to existence and to a share in the produce of nature.
Year of publication: |
2006
|
---|---|
Authors: | King, J. E. ; Marangos, John |
Published in: |
History of Economic Ideas. - Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma. - Vol. 14.2006, 1, p. 55-71
|
Publisher: |
Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Two arguments for basic income : Thomas Paine (1737 - 1809) and Thomas Spence (1750 - 1814)
King, John E., (2006)
-
King, John E., (1972)
-
The philosophical roots of development ethics
Marangos, John, (2019)
- More ...