Two conceptions of economics and maximisation
Economics has evolved from a 'domain-focused' conception, i.e. the study of specific kinds of human activities, to a 'scarcity-based' conception, i.e. the study of a particular approach to all human choices. It thus enlarged its domain and narrowed its perspective: instrumental maximising. This paper maintains that economics should be domain focused, with a core of scarcity-based analysis of its domain, integrated into a broader analysis. It also holds that the scarcity-based analysis of realities falling outside the economic domain is not economics, but rather a social science broader in respect to the field but narrower in respect to the analysis, and thus partial in its conclusions. Section 2 introduces these versions of economics, Section 3 links them to specific conceptions of rationality, Section 4 provides arguments for the paper's thesis and Section 5 deals with two related versions of maximisation and argues for adopting one of them. Copyright , Oxford University Press.
Year of publication: |
2013
|
---|---|
Authors: | Crespo, Ricardo F. |
Published in: |
Cambridge Journal of Economics. - Oxford University Press. - Vol. 37.2013, 4, p. 759-774
|
Publisher: |
Oxford University Press |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Three Arguments Against Menger's Suggested Aristotelianism
Crespo, Ricardo F., (2003)
-
Reciprocity and practical comparability
Crespo, Ricardo F., (2008)
-
"Practical comparability" and ends in economics
Crespo, Ricardo F., (2007)
- More ...