Veto Threats: Rhetoric in a Bargaining Game.
A specific bargaining game is studied, motivated by the speech-making, bill-proposing, and bill-vetoing observed in legislative processes. The game has two players, a chooser and a proposer, with the preferences of the chooser not known to the proposer. The chooser starts the game by talking. Then the proposer proposes an outcome, which the chooser accepts or vetos. Only two kinds of perfect equilibria exist. In the more interesting kind, the chooser tells the proposer which of two sets contains his type. Two proposals are possibly elicited, a compromise proposal and the proposer's favorite proposal. Ironically, only the compromise proposal is ever vetoed. Copyright 1989, the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Year of publication: |
1989
|
---|---|
Authors: | Matthews, Steven A |
Published in: |
The Quarterly Journal of Economics. - MIT Press. - Vol. 104.1989, 2, p. 347-69
|
Publisher: |
MIT Press |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Advertising Signals of Product Quality
Matthews, Steven A, (1990)
-
Moral Hazard and Capital Structure Dynamics
Dewatripont, Mathias, (2002)
-
Monopoly and the Rate of Extraction of Exhaustible Resources: Note.
Lewis, Tracy R, (1979)
- More ...