"What's Missing from the Capital Gains Debate? Real Estate and Capital Gains Taxation"
The recent enactment of a capital gains tax cut resulted, according to Hudson and Feder, from the absence of a true appreciation or consideration of the real beneficiaries of such a cut, probable actual effects, the distinction between productive and nonproductive sources of capital gains (two-thirds of capital gains accrue to real estate, which is a fixed, nonproductive asset), and distortions in our current income accounting system (which shield most taxation). The across-the-board cut, which treats real estate appreciation and true capital gains as estate income from the same, is a giveaway to real estate and will steer capital and entrepreneurial resources to a search for unearned income.
Authors: | Hudson, Michael ; Feder, Kris |
---|---|
Institutions: | Levy Economics Institute |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
"Real Estate and the Capital Gains Debate"
Hudson, Michael, (1997)
-
Real Estate and the Capital Gains Debate
Hudson, Michael, (1997)
-
What's missing from the capital gains debate? Real estate and capital gains taxation
Hudson, Michael, (1997)
- More ...