What We Owe Our Children, They Their Children, …
Egalitarian theorists, since Rawls, have in the main advocated equalizing some objective measure of individual well-being, such as primary goods, functionings, or resources, rather than subjective welfare. This discussion, however, has assumed, implicitly, a static environment. By analyzing a society that survives for many generations, we demonstrate that equality of opportunity for some objective condition is incompatible with human development over time. We argue that this incompatibility can be resolved by equalizing opportunities for welfare. Thus, "subjectivism" seems necessary if we are to hope for a society that can both equalize opportunities and support the development of human capacity over time. Copyright 2004 Blackwell Publishing Inc..
Year of publication: |
2004
|
---|---|
Authors: | Roemer, John E. ; Veneziani, Roberto |
Published in: |
Journal of Public Economic Theory. - Association for Public Economic Theory - APET, ISSN 1097-3923. - Vol. 6.2004, 5, p. 637-654
|
Publisher: |
Association for Public Economic Theory - APET |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Intergenerational justice, international relations and sustainability
Roemer, John E., (2007)
-
What we owe our children, they their children, ...
Roemer, John E., (2004)
-
What we owe our children, they their children, ...
Roemer, John E., (2001)
- More ...