Whither Tax Depreciation?
In the 15 years since the depreciation rules were calculated to approximate economic depreciation for structures and equipment, that neutrality (using a constant set of economic depreciation estimates) has been somewhat undermined by a relatively more favorable treatment of equipment due to lower inflation and a lengthening of class lives for structures. An argument can be made that shorter lives for structures is in order; however, there is also a movement to provide tax benefits for "high tech" equipment, which becomes rapidly obsolescent. This focus on short-lived, high tech assets may be misplaced because the pace of technological advance is unlikely to be sustained at a high level, short-lived assets have a built-in protection against lives that are too long because their costs can be deducted on discard, and short-lived assets are likely to be less sensitive to changes in rate of return than are long-lived assets. From an administrative point of view, the current system (which limits the Treasury's ability to assign asset classes) is rigid and does not provide for on-going depreciation research.
Year of publication: |
2001
|
---|---|
Authors: | Gravelle, Jane G. |
Published in: |
National Tax Journal. - National Tax Association - NTA. - Vol. 54.2001, n. 3, p. 513-26
|
Publisher: |
National Tax Association - NTA |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Gravelle, Jane G., (1988)
-
International competitiveness and the Tax Reform Act of 1986
Gravelle, Jane G., (1987)
-
Corporate taxation and the efficiency gains of the 1986 Tax Reform Act
Gravelle, Jane G., (1989)
- More ...