Why Plaintiffs' Attorneys Use Contingent and Defense Attorneys Fixed Fee Contracts
Year of publication: |
2016
|
---|---|
Authors: | Emons, Winand |
Other Persons: | Fluet, Claude (contributor) |
Publisher: |
[2016]: [S.l.] : SSRN |
Subject: | Rechtsberufe | Legal profession | Zivilprozess | Civil litigation | Honorar | Fee (Remuneration) | Vergütungssystem | Compensation system |
Extent: | 1 Online-Ressource (24 p) |
---|---|
Type of publication: | Book / Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Notes: | Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments August 1, 2014 erstellt |
Other identifiers: | 10.2139/ssrn.2475032 [DOI] |
Classification: | D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; K41 - Litigation Process |
Source: | ECONIS - Online Catalogue of the ZBW |
-
Why plaintiffs’ attorneys use contingent and defense attorneys fixed fee contracts
Emons, Winand, (2013)
-
Bottom-Feeding at the Bar : Usury Law and Value-Dissipating Attorneys in Japan
Ramseyer, J. Mark, (2013)
-
Why plaintiffs’ attorneys use contingent and defense attorneys fixed fee contracts
Emons, Winand, (2013)
- More ...
-
Non-comparative versus Comparative Advertising as a Quality Signal
Emons, Winand, (2011)
-
Strategic communication with reporting costs
Fluet, Claude, (2016)
-
Why plaintiffs' attorneys use contingent and defense attorneys fixed fee contracts
Emons, Winand, (2013)
- More ...