Will legislated early intervention prevent the next banking crisis?
A key provision of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA) was prompt corrective action (PCA). PCA emphasized early intervention by bank supervisors and was intended to limit forbearance by making supervisory intervention more timely and less discretionary. However, PCA legislation appears to have been oversold. Had PCA been in place during the recent banking crisis in New England, it would have had little, if any, effect. Relative to actions taken by supervisors, PCA provisions would not have imposed more severe restrictions on banks, intervened earlier, or intervened in problem banks that would otherwise have been missed.
Year of publication: |
1996
|
---|---|
Authors: | Peek, Joe ; Rosengren, Eric S. |
Institutions: | Federal Reserve Bank of Boston |
Subject: | Banks and banking | Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 | Financial crises - Asia |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
FDICIA : where did it come from and where will it take us?
Lemieux, Catharine, (1993)
-
Did FDICIA enhance market discipline on community banks? a look at evidence from the jumbo-CD market
Hall, John R., (2002)
-
The major supervisory initiatives post-FDICIA: Are they based on the goals of PCA? Should they be?
Eisenbeis, Robert A., (2002)
- More ...
Similar items by person