Showing 1 - 10 of 19
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010241318
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014425526
An IPV 2-bidder second-price auction is preceded by two rounds of bribing: prior to the auction each bidder can try to bribe his rival to depart from the auction, so that he (the briber) will become the sole participant and obtain the good for the reserve price. Bribes are offered sequentially...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013125179
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012718140
Intermediaries may bargain with several upstream providers on behalf of consumers who do not directly pay for consumption, such as an insurer bargaining with hospitals. We show that the common Nash- in-Nash solution, while useful for estimation, can predict Nash overpricing: prices that exceed...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011807830
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011817726
An IPV 2-bidder second-price auction is preceded by two rounds of bribing: prior to the auction each bidder can try to bribe his rival to depart from the auction, so that he (the briber) will become the sole participant and obtain the good for the reserve price. Bribes are offered sequentially...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009321779
A bargaining solution balances fairness and efficiency if each player's payoff lies between the minimum and maximum of the payoffs assigned to him by the egalitarian and utilitarian solutions. In the 2-person bargaining problem, the Nash solution is the unique scale-invariant solution satisfying...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009324194
I study collusion between two bidders in a general symmetric IPV repeated auction, without communication, side transfers, or public randomization. I construct a collusive scheme, endogenous bid rotation, that generates a payoff larger than the bid rotation payoff.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009324195
I characterize the proportional N-person bargaining solutions by individual rationality, translation invariance, feasible set continuity, and a new axiom - interim improvement. The latter says that if the disagreement point d is known, but the feasible set is not - it may be either S or T, where...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009324196