Showing 1 - 10 of 297
activities, but they reduce management flexibility and may contribute to lower profit margins. Rising donor governance in U …I study "donor governance," which occurs when contributors to non-profit firms place restrictions on their gifts to …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012457601
, laboratory work and, indeed, psychology more generally, gives us little guidance as to market outcomes. Economics provides a …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012468491
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013480872
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000664750
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010499651
In the U.S., Great Britain, and in many other countries, the gap between the demand and the supply of human organs for transplantation is on the rise, despite the efforts of governments and health agencies to promote donor registration. In some countries of continental Europe, however, cadaveric...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012468089
The economic argument for subsidizing charitable giving relies on the positive externalities of charitable activities, particularly from the religious institutions that are the largest recipients of giving. But the net external effects of subsidies to religious giving will also depend on a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012468319
How can charities solicit high-capacity donors to provide the funds for matching grants and leadership gifts? In conjunction with one of Texas A&M University's fundraising organizations, we conducted a field experiment to study whether high-income donors respond to non-personal solicitations, as...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012480941
Politicians and regulators rely on feedback from the public when setting policies. For-profit corporations and non … a firm donates to a non-profit, the grantee is more likely to comment on rules for which the firm has also provided a …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012480980
To what extent is U.S. state tax policy affected by corporate political contributions? The 2010 Supreme Court Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling provides an exogenous shock to corporate campaign spending, allowing corporations to spend on elections in 23 states which...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013362006