Similar Search Results

Economic Integration and Investment Incentives in Regulated Industries

Auriol, Emmanuelle; Biancini, Sara - C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers - 2009

The paper studies the impact of market integration on investment incentives in non-competitive industries. It distinguishes between investment in transportation and production cost-reducing technologies. Each domestic firm is controlled by a national regulator in a common market made of two...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005012490

Government Outsourcing: Public Contracting with Private Monopoly

Auriol, Emmanuelle; Picard, Pierre M - C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers - 2006

The paper studies the impact of government budget constraint in a pure adverse selection problem of monopoly regulation … to regulation is proposed in which firms are free to enter the market and to choose their price and output levels … than traditional regulation where governments commit to both investment and operation cash-flows. This is especially …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005067470

Competition vs. Regulation in Mobile Telecommunications

Stennek, Johan; Tangerås, Thomas - Institutet för Näringslivsforskning (IFN) - 2006

This paper questions whether competition can replace sector-specific regulation of mobile telecommunications. We show …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005190638

A Theory of BOT Concession Contracts

Auriol, Emmanuelle; Picard, Pierre M - C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers - 2011

In this paper, we discuss the choice for build-operate-and-transfer (BOT) concessions when governments and managers do not share the same information regarding the operation characteristics of a facility. We show that larger shadow costs of public funds and larger information asymmetries entice...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008921773

Competition vs. Regulation in Mobile Telecommunications

Stennek, Johan; Tangerås, Thomas P. - C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers - 2007

This paper questions whether competition can replace sector-specific regulation of mobile telecommunications. We show …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005661431

Exclusive Quality - Why Exclusive Distribution may Benefit the TV-viewers

Stennek, Johan - Institutet för Näringslivsforskning (IFN) - 2007

Sports organizations, Hollywood studios and TV channels grant satellite and cable networks exclusive rights to televise their matches, movies and media contents. Exclusive distribution prevents viewers from watching attractive programs, and reduces the TV-distributors incentives to compete in...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005419550

Exclusive Quality - Why Exclusive Distribution May Benefit the TV Viewers

Stennek, Johan - C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers - 2007

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005789055

Industry Concentration and Welfare - On the Use of Stock Market Evidence from Horizontal Mergers

Fridolfsson, Sven-Olof; Stennek, Johan - C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers - 2006

There is diverging empirical evidence on the competitive effects of horizontal mergers: consumer prices (and thus presumably competitors' profits) often rise while competitors' share prices fall. Our model of endogenous mergers provides a possible reconciliation. It is demonstrated that...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005497962

Why Event Studies Do Not Detect Anti-Competitive Mergers

Fridolfsson, Sven-Olof; Stennek, Johan - Institutet för Näringslivsforskning (IFN) - 2000

Anticompetitive mergers increase competitors' profits, since they reduce competition. Using a model of endogenous mergers, we show that such mergers nevertheless may reduce the competitors' share-prices. Thus, event-studies can not detect anti-competitive mergers.

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005645370

Should Mergers be Controlled?

Fridolfsson, Sven-Olof; Stennek, Johan - Institutet för Näringslivsforskning (IFN) - 2000

Anticompetitive mergers benefit competitors more than the merging firms. We show that such externalities reduce firms' incentives to merge (a holdup mechanism). Firms delay merger proposals, thereby foregoing valuable profits and hoping other firms will merge instead - a war of attrition. The...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005645389