Showing 1 - 5 of 5
We analyze how subjects’ self-assessment depends on whether its accuracy is observable to others. We find that women downgrade their selfassessment given observability while men do not. Women avoid the shame they may have if others observe that they overestimated themselves. Men, however, do...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010427624
social dilemmas. We subject our model to data from an experimental public goods game and a risk experiment, and we measure …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010427625
This paper suggests a potential rationale for the recent empirical finding that overconfident agents tend to self-select into more competitive environments (e.g. Dohmen and Falk, forthcoming). In particular, it shows that moderate overconfidence in a contest can improve the agent's performance...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010427565
In this paper, we study the individual payoff effects of overconfident self-perception in teams. In particular, we demonstrate that the welfare of an overconfident agent in a team of one rational and one overconfident agent or a team of two overconfident agents can be higher than that of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010427615
maximization problem of the firm. As a result, monitoring and pay should be complements. In our experiment, between and within …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010427614