Showing 1 - 10 of 155
In a matching problem between students and schools, a mechanism is said to be robustly stable if it is stable, strategy-proof, and immune to a combined manipulation, where a student first misreports her preferences and then blocks the matching that is produced by the mechanism. We find that even...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011599445
to either one of its two agents. Together with efficiency, and a version of equal treatment of equals, these properties …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011599466
to either one of its two agents. Together with efficiency, and a version of equal treatment of equals, these properties …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009216676
In a matching problem between students and schools, a mechanism is said to be robustly stable if it is stable, strategy-proof, and immune to a combined manipulation, where a student first misreports her preferences and then blocks the matching that is produced by the mechanism. We find that even...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008490389
the MPW rule is the unique rule satisfying \textit{strategy-proofness}, \textit{efficiency}, \textit …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011599546
the MPW rule is the unique rule satisfying \textit{strategy-proofness}, \textit{efficiency}, \textit …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010773117
Floor constraints are a prominent feature of many matching markets, such as medical residency, teacher assignment, and military cadet matching. We develop a theory of matching markets under floor constraints. We introduce a stability notion, which we call floor respecting stability, for markets...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013189041
Strategy-proofness, requiring that truth-telling be a dominant strategy, is a standard concept in social choice theory. However, this concept has serious drawbacks. In particular, many strategy-proof mechanisms have multiple Nash equilibria, some of which produce the wrong outcome. A possible...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011599388
This paper analyzes strategy-proof collective choice rules when individuals have single-crossing preferences on a finite and ordered set of social alternatives. It shows that a social choice rule is anonymous, unanimous, and strategy-proof on a maximal single-crossing domain if and only if it is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011599417
In a voting model where the set of feasible alternatives is a subset of a product set $A = A_1\times\cdots\ldots{}A_m$ of $m$ finite categories, we characterize the set of all strategy-proof social choice functions for three different types of preference domains over $A$, namely for the domains...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011599473