Showing 1 - 10 of 83
We consider collective decision problems where some agents have private information about alternatives and others don't. Voting takes place under strategy-proof rules. Prior to voting, informed agents may or may not disclose their private information, thus eventually influencing the preferences...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012903392
Consider the following principle regarding the performance of collective choice rules. "If a rule selects alternative x in situation 1, and alternative y in situation 2, there must be an alternative z, and some member of society whose appreciation of z relative to x has increased when going from...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013226894
We observe that three salient solutions to matching, division and house allocation problems are not only (partially) strategy-proof, but (partially) group strategy-proof as well, in appropriate domains of definition. That is the case for the Gale-Shapley mechanism, the uniform rule and the top...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013033174
We observe that many salient rules to allocate private goods are not only (partially) strategy-proof, but also (partially) group strategy-proof, in appropriate domains of definition. That is so for solutions to matching, division, cost sharing, house allocation and auctions, in spite of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013031379
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000929586
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011442624
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011872382
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013253274
This chapter surveys the literature on strategy proofness from a historical perspective. While I discuss the connections with other works on incentives in mechanism design, the main emphasis is on social choice models.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014025183
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015374941