Showing 131 - 137 of 137
This paper challenges recent results on the fragility of the value of commitment. It introduces a specific notion of the ’value of information’ for a later-moving player about the action choice of a previously-moving player, gives conditions under which this value is positive and shows that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010839589
prediction using a two-stage contest in lab experiments, we fnd that stage-2 efforts are identical in immediate and delayed …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011301688
This paper studies a simple setting in which the contractual arrangements which determine the incentives for agents are not designed by a single central planner, but are themselves the outcome of a game among multiple noncooperatively acting principals. The notion of an Epsilon Contracting...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005370616
This paper challenges recent results on the fragility of the value of commitment. It introduces a specific notion of the 'value of information' for a later-moving player about the action choice of a previously-moving player, gives conditions under which this value is positive and shows that a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010397169
This paper challenges recent results on the fragility of the value of commitment. It introduces a specific notion of the 'value of information' for a later-moving player about the action choice of a previously-moving player, gives conditions under which this value is positive and shows that a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010237655
This paper studies a simple setting in which the contractual arrangements which determine the incentives for agents are not designed by a single central planner, but are themselves the outcome of a game among multiple non-cooperatively acting principals. The notion of an Epsilon Contracting...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014137334
This paper studies a simple setting in which the contractual arrangements which determine the incentives for agents are not designed by a single central planner, but are themselves the outcome of a game among multiple non-cooperatively acting principals. The notion of an Epsilon Contracting...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014141846