Showing 1 - 7 of 7
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001702959
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001614453
Public opposition often hinders the siting of nuisance and noxious facilities. However, there is often support for the siting plan within the community, especially when the facility will bring economic development or a compensation package funded by the company siting the facility. Why have...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012787285
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006113899
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007114676
Public opposition often hinders the siting of nuisance and noxious facilities. However, there is often support for the siting plan within the community, especially when the facility will bring economic development or a compensation package funded by the company siting the facility. Why have...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005716890
This paper provides evidence that public goods represent a more acceptable response to public harms than monetary compensation. We demonstrate a preference for public goods over monetary compensation, in part because receipt of public goods may limit the sense of guilt or bribery from accepting...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005038518