Showing 1 - 10 of 15
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012140172
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012424513
Individuals and two-person teams play a hidden - action trust game with pre - play communication. We replicate previous results for individuals that non-binding promises increase cooperation rates. But this does not extend to teams. Wh ile teams make non-binding promises to cooperate at the same...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012024205
Individuals and two-person teams play a hidden-action trust game with pre-play communication. We replicate previous results for individuals that non-binding promises increase cooperation rates. But this does not extend to teams. While teams make non-binding promises to cooperate at the same rate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012901587
Using an experiment, we demonstrate that a communication regime where a worker communicates about his intended effort is less effective in i) soliciting truthful information, and ii) motivating effort, than a regime where he communicates about his past effort. Our experiment uses a real-effort...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012902097
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012386795
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012226744
Individuals and two-person teams play a hidden - action trust game with pre - play communication. We replicate previous results for individuals that non-binding promises increase cooperation rates. But this does not extend to teams. Wh ile teams make non-binding promises to cooperate at the same...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012014362
We design a laboratory experiment to identify whether a preference for randomization defines a stable type across different choice environments. In games and individual decisions, subjects face twenty simultaneous repetitions of the same choice. Subjects can randomize by making different choices...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014101545
Using a laboratory experiment, we identify whether decision makers consider it a mistake to violate canonical choice axioms. To do this, we incentivize subjects to report which of several axioms they want their decisions to satisfy. Then, subjects make lottery choices which might conflict with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014103348