Showing 1 - 10 of 308
When is it socially advantageous for legal rules to be changed in the light of altered circumstances? In answering this basic question here, a simple point is developed - that past compliance with legal rules tends to reduce the social advantages of legal change. The reasons are twofold:...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014053459
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010361453
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010372563
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010490638
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001363987
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001378543
The public at large, many policymakers, and some economists hold views of social welfare that attach some importance to factors other than individuals' utilities. This note shows that any such non-individualistic notion of social welfare conflicts with the Pareto principle
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012471750
The government often provides relief against large risks, such as disasters. A simple, general rationale for this role of government is considered here that applies even when private contracting to share risks is not subject to market imperfections. Specifically, the optimal private sharing of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013052679
The government often provides relief against large risks, such as disasters. A simple, general rationale for this role of government is considered here that applies even when private contracting to share risks is not subject to market imperfections. Specifically, the optimal private sharing of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013053735
The public at large, many policymakers, and some economists hold views of social welfare that attach some importance to factors other than individuals' utilities. This note shows that any such non-individualistic notion of social welfare conflicts with the Pareto principle
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013234371