Showing 1 - 6 of 6
We show that too much meritocracy, modeled as accuracy of performance ranking in contests, can be a bad thing: in contests with homogeneous agents, it reduces output and is Pareto inefficient. In contests with sufficiently heterogeneous agents, discouragement and complacency effects further...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011932489
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013373106
We extend Krugman's (1979) model of trade to multiple sectors or industries and show that, sector-by-sector, a bit of trade is worse than no trade at all. The reason is that the gains from the initiation of trade are second-order, while the welfare loss from the associated drop in varieties is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012842638
We show that too much meritocracy, modeled as accuracy of performance ranking incontests, can be a bad thing: in contests with homogeneous agents, it reduces output and isPareto inefficient. In contests with sufficiently heterogeneous agents, discouragement andcomplacency effects further reduce...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012906885
We show that too much meritocracy, modeled as accuracy of performance ranking in contests, can be a bad thing: in contests with homogeneous agents, it reduces output and is Pareto inefficient. In contests with sufficiently heterogeneous agents, discouragement and complacency effects further...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012851832
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014348161