Showing 1 - 6 of 6
Statistical models of unobserved heterogeneity are typically formalized as mixtures of simple parametric models and interest naturally focuses on testing for homogeneity versus general mixture alternatives. Many tests of this type can be interpreted as C(») tests, as in Neyman (1959), and shown...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011941493
Statistical models of unobserved heterogeneity are typically formalized as mix- tures of simple parametric models and interest naturally focuses on testing for homogeneity versus general mixture alternatives. Many tests of this type can be interpreted as C(») tests, as in Neyman (1959), and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010318728
Statistical models of unobserved heterogeneity are typically formalized as mixtures of simple parametric models and interest naturally focuses on testing for homogeneity versus general mixture alternatives. Many tests of this type can be interpreted as C(α) tests, as in Neyman (1959), and shown...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009715854
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011951435
Statistical models of unobserved heterogeneity are typically formalized as mixtures of simple parametric models and interest naturally focuses on testing for homogeneity versus general mixture alternatives. Many tests of this type can be interpreted as C(α) tests, as in Neyman (1959), and shown...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011758032
Statistical models of unobserved heterogeneity are typically formalised as mixtures of simple parametric models and interest naturally focuses on testing for homogeneity versus general mixture alternatives. Many tests of this type can be interpreted as C (a) tests, as in Neyman (1959), and shown...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010631588