Showing 1 - 10 of 14
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003463560
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003682931
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009248110
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001988433
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001202974
The inability of political actors to make credible promises to broad segments of society—a previously unexplored determinant of civil war—causes both elected and unelected governments to pursue public policies that leave citizens worse off and more prone to revolt. Noncredible political...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012561528
This paper suggests a new factor that makes civil war more likely: the inability of political actors to make credible promises to broad segments of society. Lacking this ability, both elected and unelected governments pursue public policies that leave citizens less well-off and more prone to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010521723
Despite the absence of formal institutions to constrain opportunistic behavior, some autocracies successfully attract private investment. Prior work explains such success by the relative size of the autocrat's winning coalition or the existence of legislatures. We advance on this understanding...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013133076
The inability of political actors to make credible promises to broad segments of society-a previously unexplored determinant of civil war-causes both elected and unelected governments to pursue public policies that leave citizens worse off and more prone to revolt. Noncredible political actors...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012759273
This paper suggests a new factor that makes civil war more likely: the inability of political actors to make credible promises to broad segments of society. Lacking this ability, both elected and unelected governments pursue public policies that leave citizens less well-off and more prone to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012552636