Showing 1 - 10 of 668
Parents preferring sons tend to go on to have more children until one or more boys are born, and to concentrate investment in boys for a given sibsize. Therefore, having a brother may affect child outcomes in two ways: indirectly, by decreasing sibsize, and directly, where sibsize remains...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011335624
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000887057
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012160589
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010406007
Parents preferring sons tend to go on to have more children until one or more boys are born, and to concentrate investment in boys for a given sibsize. Therefore, having a brother may affect child outcomes in two ways: indirectly, by decreasing sibsize, and directly, where sibsize remains...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010412292
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010414333
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009413340
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003381629
Parents preferring sons tend to go on to have more children until a boy is born, and to concentrate investment in boys for a given number of children (sibsize). Thus, having a brother may affect child education in two ways: an indirect effect by keeping sibsize lower and a direct rivalry effect...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013005983
Parents preferring sons tend to go on to have more children until a boy is born, and to concentrate investment in boys for a given number of children (sibsize). Thus, having a brother may affect child education in two ways: an indirect effect by keeping sibsize lower and a direct rivalry effect...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012458225