Showing 1 - 10 of 11
We study a psychologically based foundation for choice errors. The decision maker applies a preference ranking after forming a 'consideration set' prior to choosing an alternative. Membership of the consideration set is determined both by the alternative specific salience and by the rationality...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010877095
We introduce attention games. Alternatives ranked by quality (producers, politicians, sexual partners...) desire to be chosen and compete for the imperfect attention of a chooser by investing in their own salience. We prove that if alternatives can control the attention they get, then ”the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011075685
There are many situations in which alternatives ranked by quality wish to be chosen and compete for the imperfect attention of a chooser by selecting their own salience. The chooser may be "tricked" into choosing more salient but inferior alternatives. We investigate when competitive forces...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011381004
There are many situations in which alternatives ranked by quality wish to be chosen and compete for the imperfect attention of a chooser by selecting their own salience. The chooser may be "tricked" into choosing more salient but inferior alternatives. We investigate when competitive forces...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010517700
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010348309
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011951236
We model a boundedly rational agent who suffers from limited attention. The agent considers each feasible alternative with a given (unobservable) probability,the attention parameter, and then chooses the alternative that maximises a preference relation within the set of considered alternatives....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010904125
There are many situations in which alternatives ranked by quality wish to be chosen and compete for the imperfect attention of a chooser by selecting their own salience. The chooser may be “tricked" into choosing more salient but inferior alter- natives. We investigate when competitive forces...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011265503
We study a psychologically based foundation for choice errors. The decision maker applies a preference ranking after forming a ?consideration set?prior to choosing an alternative. Membership of the consideration set is determined both by the alternative speci?c salience and by the rationality of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008526404
We model a boundedly rational agent who suffers from limited attention. The agent considers each feasible alternative with a given (unobservable) probability, the attention parameter, and then chooses the alternative that maximises a preference relation within the set of considered alternatives....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010583190