Showing 1 - 8 of 8
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010193543
Mutually beneficial agreements might fail if the parties fear contractual opportunism. Litigation is supposed to prevent this, but still leaves room for litigational opportunism: Even knowing that the opponent has fulfilled his obligations, a party might bring suit. We show that with positive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003186905
Mutually beneficial agreements might fail if the parties fear contractual opportunism. Litigation is supposed to be a remedy, but gives scope for another kind of opportunistic behavior which we call litigational opportunism: Even knowing that the opponent has fulfilled his obligations, a party...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003186989
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001337155
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001399038
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001451737
The paper analyzes the effects of different litigation cost allocation rules, detection skill of judges (judicial errors), and the mode of enforcement of foreign judgments on the home bias in trade and sheds a new light on the so-called border-effect puzzle. In our model the border effect or...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013105251
The prosecution of criminals is costly, and subject to errors. In contrast to adversarial court procedures, the prosecutor is regarded as an impartial investigator and aide to the judge in inquisitorial justice systems. We show in a sequential prosecution game of a Bayesian court that a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012243502