Showing 1 - 10 of 260
Typically survey data have responses with gaps, outliers and ties, and the distributions of the responses might be skewed. Usually, in small area estimation, predictive inference is done using a two-stage Bayesian model with normality at both levels (responses and area means).This is the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012291514
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011334281
In self-reported data usually a phenomenon called 'heaping' occurs, i.e. survey participants round the values of their income, weight or height to some degree. Additionally, respondents may be more prone to round off or up due to social desirability. By ignoring the heaping process a severe bias...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011325727
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009624475
Item non-response occurs when respondents fail to provide answers to some or all of the questions posed during survey interviews. The standard procedure is to exclude such responses from the econometric analysis. This may be appropriate if the sample included does not differ significantly from...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011477155
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013179352
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012421454
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011628520
Survey under-coverage of top incomes leads to bias in survey-based estimates of overall income inequality. Using income tax record data in combination with survey data is a potential approach to address the problem; we consider here the UK's pioneering "SPI adjustment" method that implements...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011691130
Survey under-coverage of top incomes leads to bias in survey-based estimates of overall income inequality. Using income tax record data in combination with survey data is a potential approach to address the problem; we consider here the UK's pioneering 'SPI adjustment' method that implements...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011703644