Showing 1 - 10 of 496
Most extant studies consider golden parachutes as the totality of change-in-control payments. However, for the median CEO of firms listed in the S&P SmallCap 600 index in 2009, golden parachute payments are only 46% of total change-in-control compensation. We measure total change-in-control...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011117536
CEO succession at many companies occurs in a black box. Shareholders are not privy to boardroom discussions prior to the announcement of a CEO departure, and press releases announcing the change contain boilerplate language that does not make it clear whether the CEO stepped down voluntary or...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011870450
Institutional investors pay considerable attention to the quality of a company's governance. Unfortunately, it is difficult for outside observers to reliably gauge governance quality. Oftentimes, poor governance manifests itself only after decisions have been made and their outcomes known. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011864693
The litmus test for an effective compensation program is whether it provides “pay for performance.” While the concept of pay for performance is simple, its implementation is not. In particular, boards must consider not only whether a compensation plan encourages executives to pursue...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011864729
Shareholders pay considerable attention to the choice of executive selected as the new CEO whenever a change in leadership takes place. However, without an inside look at the leading candidates to assume the CEO role, it is difficult for shareholders to tell whether the board has made the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011864957
Whether executive compensation practices reflect optimal contracting or managerial power is one of the most fundamental and controversial topics in compensation and governance research. We shed light on this central issue by being the first to study the role of independent directors in adjusting...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014350887
We explore the effect of institutional directors on Chief Executive Officer (CEO) pay (total, fixed, and variable compensation). We delve particularly into the impact of pressure-sensitive and pressure-resistant institutional directors, who, respectively, represent institutional investors who...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012297875
This paper examines how executive compensation influences the market value of the firm's assets. After controlling for endogeneity, we find that boards have set the incentive to incur risk (vega) to maximize shareholder value, but that incentives to increase returns (delta) do not maximize...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013128457
This study examines compensation disclosure and corporate governance in the Chinese stock market. China's unfolding governance reform and the adoption of Western-style disclosure present a quasi-experimental setting to examine the effect of governance mechanisms on disclosure level. We code...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013155193
Say on pay is the practice of granting shareholders the right to vote on a company's executive compensation program at the annual shareholder meeting. Under the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, publicly traded companies in the U.S. are required to adopt say on pay. Advocates of this approach believe that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013065901