Showing 1 - 10 of 53
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008905039
We propose a signaling model in which the central bank and firms receive information on cost-push shocks independently from each other. If the firms’ signals are rather unlikely to be informative, central banks should remain silent about their own private signals. If, however, firms are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008746680
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010356820
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003800579
In this paper we examine a model where firms decide on the intensity of information acquisition about shocks. We analyze how the monetary policy framework impacts on the aggregate amount of information collected by firms. We show that it is socially beneficial to delegate monetary policy to a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003761371
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010395258
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011708315
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014364405
We examine whether it is socially beneficial for the individual voting records of central bank council members to be published when the general public is unsure about central bankers' efficiency and central bankers are aiming for re-election. We show that publication is initially harmful since...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010295700
This paper examines whether it is socially desirable for the individual voting records of central bank council members to be published when central bankers' preferences differ. We show that the misrepresentation of their preferences is not advantageous for central bankers although central...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010295701