Showing 1 - 10 of 324
We consider a licensing mechanism for process innovations that combines a license auction with royalty contracts to those who lose the auction. Firms' bids are dual signals of their cost reductions: the winning bid signals the own cost reduction to rival oligopolists, whereas the losing bid...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003935644
This paper reconsiders the licensing of a common value innovation to a downstream duopoly, assuming a dual licensing scheme that combines a first-price license auction with royalty contracts for losers. Prior to bidding firms observe imperfect signals of the expected cost reduction; after the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003935649
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003874818
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009663681
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010242291
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010336478
This paper revisits the licensing of a non-drastic process innovation by an outside innovator to a Cournot oligopoly. We propose a new mechanism that combines a restrictive license auction with royalty licensing. This mechanism is more profitable than standard license auctions, auctioning...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010365856
This paper revisits the standard analysis of licensing a cost reducing innovation by an outside innovator to a Cournot oligopoly. We propose a new mechanism that combines elements of a license auction with royalty licensing by granting the losers of the auction the option to sign a royalty...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010371073
This paper considers the optimal design of dynamic research contests when the buyer can set time-dependent prizes. We derive the buyer-optimal contest and show that it entails an increasing prize schedule. Remarkably, this allows the buyer to implement a global stopping rule. In particular, the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011538596
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011409160