Showing 1 - 10 of 11
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012693881
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012875953
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012166855
Theoretical models imply fund size and performance should be negatively linked. However, empiricists have failed to uncover consistent support for this negative relation. Using a new econometric framework which includes fund-specific sensitivities to decreasing returns to scale, we find a both...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012901686
Our paper explores the link between cross-sectional fund return dispersion and performance evaluation. The foundation of our model is the simple intuition that in periods of high return dispersion, which is associated with high levels of idiosyncratic risk for zero-alpha funds, it is easier for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012899749
I develop a new spectrum of moment bounds on the pricing kernel. They stem from the solution of an optimization problem that is complementary to Hansen and Jagannathan's (1991) approach. Economically, they measure the discrepancy between what an optimizing agent could achieve if all assets (that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012857191
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013259772
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013259856
Hundreds of papers and hundreds of factors attempt to explain the cross-section of expected returns. Given this extensive data mining, it does not make any economic or statistical sense to use the usual significance criteria for a newly discovered factor, e.g., a t-ratio greater than 2.0....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013035730
Both Kosowski et al. (2006) and Fama and French (2010) evaluate whether mutual funds outperform, but their conclusions are very different. We reconcile their findings. We show that the Fama and French method suffers from an undersampling problem that leads to a failure to reject the null...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013323960