Showing 1 - 9 of 9
In this paper the concepts of manipulation as strategic voting (misrepresentation of true preferences) and strategic nomination (by adding, or removing alternatives) are investigated. The connection between Arrow’s and Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorems is discussed from the viewpoint of dilemma...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010529891
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010260059
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013166963
Cerreia-Vioglio, Ghirardato, Maccheroni, Marinacci and Siniscalchi (Economic Theory, 48:341-375, 2011) have recently proposed a very general axiomatisation of preferences in the presence of ambiguity, viz. Monotonic Bernoullian Archimedean (MBA) preference orderings. This paper investigates the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010187944
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011593499
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011917474
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012129542
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011707674
This article surveys the literature that investigates the consistency of Arrow's social choice axioms when his unrestricted domain assumptions are replaced by domain conditions that incorporate the restrictions on agendas and preferences encountered in economic environments. Both social welfare...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014025191