Showing 1 - 10 of 482
This paper studies the welfare consequences of a vertical merger that raises rivals costs when downstream competition is à la Cournot between firms with constant asymmetric marginal costs. The main result is that such a vertical merger can nevertheless improve welfare if it involves a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011410253
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011434915
In this paper, we tackle the dilemma of pruning versus proliferation in a vertically differentiated oligopoly under the …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011451580
In a recent paper, Alipranti et al. (2014, Price vs. quantity competition in a vertically related market, Economics Letters, 124: 122-126) show that in a vertically related market Cournot competition yields higher social welfare compared to Bertrand competition if the upstream firm subsidises...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011569602
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011746831
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011781920
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011804711
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011810509
This paper demonstrates that the standard conclusions regarding the comparison of Cournot and Bertrand competition are reversed in a vertically related market with upstream monopoly and trading via two-part tariffs. In such a market, downstream Cournot competition yields higher output, lower...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010351502
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012658736