Showing 1 - 10 of 18
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008665491
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009520128
Loss aversion can occur in riskless and risky choices. Yet, there is no evidence whether people who are loss averse in riskless choices are also loss averse in risky choices. We measure individual-level loss aversion in riskless choices in an endowment effect experiment by eliciting both WTA and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008738472
Loss aversion can occur in riskless and risky choices. Yet, there is no evidence whether people who are loss averse in riskless choices are also loss averse in risky choices. We measure individual-level loss aversion in riskless choices in an endowment effect experiment by eliciting both WTA and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003586547
Loss aversion can occur in riskless and risky choices. Yet, there is no evidence whether people who are loss averse in riskless choices are also loss averse in risky choices. We measure individual-level loss aversion in riskless choices in an endowment effect experiment by eliciting both WTA and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003502465
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009731249
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003643488
Loss aversion, the fact that losses have a greater impact than gains, is a fundamental property of behavioral accounts of choice. In this paper, we suggest four possible characterizations of the relative impact of losses and gains: (1) It could be a constant, such as the much cited value of 2,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003289075
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003203631
Loss aversion, the fact that losses have a greater impact than gains, is a fundamental property of behavioral accounts of choice. In this paper, we suggest four possible characterizations of the relative impact of losses and gains: (1) It could be a constant, such as the much cited value of 2,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003361690