Showing 1 - 10 of 17
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003285305
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003337128
In July 2005 the Boston School Committee voted to replace the existing Boston school choice mechanism with a deferred acceptance mechanism that simplifies the strategic choices facing parents. This paper presents the empirical case against the previous Boston mechanism, a priority matching...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013240652
In July 2005 the Boston School Committee voted to replace the existing Boston school choice mechanism with a deferred acceptance mechanism that simplifies the strategic choices facing parents. This paper presents the empirical case against the previous Boston mechanism, a priority matching...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012466706
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003781733
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009558791
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010520853
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011538634
A central argument for school choice is that families value the freedom to exercise choice and can make wise decisions. This principle may underlie why lottery-based school evaluations, which exploit over-subscription due to excess demand, have almost always reported positive or zero achievement...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013002278
Lottery estimates suggest oversubscribed urban charter schools boost student achievement markedly. But these estimates needn't capture treatment effects for students who haven't applied to charter schools or for students attending charters for which demand is weak. This paper reports estimates...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013023765