Showing 1 - 10 of 58
In this paper we show that, in the presence of buyer and seller power, a monopolist can enter into a costly contractual relationship with a low-quality supplier with the sole intention of improving its bargaining position relative to a high-quality supplier, without ever selling the good...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013086773
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010187695
In this paper we show that, in the presence of buyer and seller power, a monopolist can enter into a costly contractual relationship with a low-quality supplier with the sole intention of improving its bargaining position relative to a high-quality supplier, without ever selling the good...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011730400
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011346104
Contractual inefficiencies within supply chains increase an input price above its marginal cost, therefore they are considered detrimental to consumer surplus. We argue that such inefficiencies may be beneficial to consumers in quality-differentiated markets where the "finiteness property"...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013091101
Double marginalization causes inefficiencies in vertical markets. This paper argues that such inefficiencies may be beneficial to final consumers in markets producing vertically differentiated goods. The rationale behind this result is that enhancing efficiency in high-quality supply chains...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011734182
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003298623
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003339501
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009764373
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009767776