Showing 1 - 10 of 1,795
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010260000
The common use of majority rule in group decision making is puzzling. In theory, it inequitably favors the proposer, and paradoxically, it disadvantages voters further if they are inequity averse. In practice, however, outcomes are equitable. The present paper analyzes data from a novel...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011762571
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014547333
It is well-established that in bargaining under complete information, two agents reach an agreement immediately. I assume that nature selects a state that favors one or the other, and the agents may not know the state with probability ε, inducing higher- order uncertainty. A unique equilibrium...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013219808
In a market with stochastic demand at most one seller can acquire costly informationabout demand. Other sellers entertain idiosyncratic beliefs about the marketdemand and the probability that an informed seller is trading in the market. Theseidiosyncratic beliefs co-evolve with the potential...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866567
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003330598
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003381759
We characterize the mixed-strategy equilibria for the bargaining game in which two players simultaneously bid for a share of a pie and receive shares proportional to their bids, or zero if the bids sum to more than 100%. Of particular interest is the symmetric equilibrium in which each player's...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012858781
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014540724
This paper analyzes reputational bargaining between two parties who can strategically send an ultimatum to resolve the conflict by law. Each party is either a justified player who is inflexible about demand and resolves the conflict by law whenever possible, or an unjustified player who is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012851185